Decartes Vs. Russell On Whether The Self Is An Object And The Mind Stability
Beginning of paper
Descartes says that the proposition "I exist" is certain, because of the theory he uses in the first meditation. If we think we exist, then were thinking period. So even if we think we don't exist, then that proves that were still thinking, therefore we must exist. Russell wants to disagree wit ....
Middle of paper
.... like greenness or smoothness or cold. Descartes says that it's not the self that changing. It's only the perceptions in the conscience.
I sway towards Descartes on this issue. I don't see the logic in the self changing for every new sense of data. If this was true , wouldn't every other object we looked at be new to us? Descartes argument for existing is much more believable, for the simple fact that if we think anything we must exist. I think are minds do have stability. Memory is ....
------------------
Word count: 445
Page count: 2 (approximately 250 words per page)
